<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Git cheat sheet, take two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two</link>
	<description>Jan Krüger&#039;s blog thingy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan C.</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two/comment-page-1#comment-13206</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two#comment-13206</guid>
		<description>Jan, I was happy to find your cheat sheet today as a few of the links to the Rusin version do not seem to be working.

I am getting back into software development after a couple of decades of doing other things.  Git, along with so many of the languages, tools, and even the more distributed nature of development, are so advanced and easier to use/integrate (in most cases) than what I worked with back in the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s.  Can I assume that your cheat sheet is still pretty much up to date?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan, I was happy to find your cheat sheet today as a few of the links to the Rusin version do not seem to be working.</p>
<p>I am getting back into software development after a couple of decades of doing other things.  Git, along with so many of the languages, tools, and even the more distributed nature of development, are so advanced and easier to use/integrate (in most cases) than what I worked with back in the 70&#8242;s and 80&#8242;s.  Can I assume that your cheat sheet is still pretty much up to date?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Git cheat sheet &#124; I wanna spend all your money ...</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Git cheat sheet &#124; I wanna spend all your money ...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] been using git now for quite a while and today I stumbled on a very nice git cheat sheet made by Jan Krüger. If you wanna try git or already use it, you might wanna have this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been using git now for quite a while and today I stumbled on a very nice git cheat sheet made by Jan Krüger. If you wanna try git or already use it, you might wanna have this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two#comment-16</guid>
		<description>PJ: I started using it for a project at work. So far it seems fairly straightforward. I&#039;ll see if I can&#039;t put something like that in as well. Perhaps I should start asking people to donate spare time for stuff like this, I don&#039;t seem to have nearly enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJ: I started using it for a project at work. So far it seems fairly straightforward. I&#8217;ll see if I can&#8217;t put something like that in as well. Perhaps I should start asking people to donate spare time for stuff like this, I don&#8217;t seem to have nearly enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two/comment-page-1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two#comment-15</guid>
		<description>ever use git-svn ?  http://utsl.gen.nz/talks/git-svn/intro.html is a pretty good intro, but it could do with a cheat sheet :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ever use git-svn ?  <a href="http://utsl.gen.nz/talks/git-svn/intro.html">http://utsl.gen.nz/talks/git-svn/intro.html</a> is a pretty good intro, but it could do with a cheat sheet :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two#comment-14</guid>
		<description>John: as the first person to notify me about a mistake (thanks!), you get... a free update of the PDF file (I have replaced the old one). I&#039;m afraid I can&#039;t afford putting expensive gadgets on top of that.
I suppose I was getting into the habit of writing &quot;great&quot; a little bit too much. Ah well, the internet still is the best spellchecker. ;)

Next thing I&#039;ll probably want to work on is a Letter version (I can try at least) and a two-sided version with the graphs and some more introductory stuff on one side and the command reference parts on the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: as the first person to notify me about a mistake (thanks!), you get&#8230; a free update of the <acronym title="Portable Document Format">PDF</acronym> file (I have replaced the old one). I&#8217;m afraid I can&#8217;t afford putting expensive gadgets on top of that.<br />
I suppose I was getting into the habit of writing &#8220;great&#8221; a little bit too much. Ah well, the internet still is the best spellchecker. ;)</p>
<p>Next thing I&#8217;ll probably want to work on is a Letter version (I can try at least) and a two-sided version with the graphs and some more introductory stuff on one side and the command reference parts on the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Reese</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>John Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Great sheet.  I do like yours better than Zack&#039;s (although I liked the Letter format, but no biggie).  But it&#039;s &quot;great great gran&lt;strong&gt;d&lt;/strong&gt;-parent&quot;. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great sheet.  I do like yours better than Zack&#8217;s (although I liked the Letter format, but no biggie).  But it&#8217;s &#8220;great great gran<strong>d</strong>-parent&#8221;. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

