<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to use TrueCrypt®-encrypted Windows system drives on Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux</link>
	<description>Jan Krüger&#039;s blog thingy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: biso</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-6293</link>
		<dc:creator>biso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-6293</guid>
		<description>i m a new user to truecrypt.is it possible to excess the the encrypt data when truecrypte has been  uninstalled from the system.(whether the data will be lost).
though we are using true crypt if someone delete the space we create by truecrypt , how  can we prevent from this things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i m a new user to truecrypt.is it possible to excess the the encrypt data when truecrypte has been  uninstalled from the system.(whether the data will be lost).<br />
though we are using true crypt if someone delete the space we create by truecrypt , how  can we prevent from this things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. C. Denton</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>J. C. Denton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>main.c line 207:

res-&gt;size = 128;

should be

res-&gt;size = 64;

Am I right ? (Has no effect though, since &quot;size&quot; is never used again here as far as I can see ... )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>main.c line 207:</p>
<p>res-&gt;size = 128;</p>
<p>should be</p>
<p>res-&gt;size = 64;</p>
<p>Am I right ? (Has no effect though, since &#8220;size&#8221; is never used again here as far as I can see &#8230; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carb Bar</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-2261</link>
		<dc:creator>Carb Bar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 08:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-2261</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just tested ext2fsd against truecrypt under windows, not work.  like ext2ifs, it would only mount disk partitions but not logical drives.  at the moment..
thanks for dmsetup-tc just what I needed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just tested ext2fsd against truecrypt under windows, not work.  like ext2ifs, it would only mount disk partitions but not logical drives.  at the moment..<br />
thanks for dmsetup-tc just what I needed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>Mary, or, John,

first off, you do know that the name you filled in there is a bit confusing, right? ;)

Anyway. tc-dmsetup currently doesn&#039;t support &quot;normal&quot; TC partitions. I wrote it when TC for Linux did not support mounting Windows encrypted system drives *at all*. Now that it does, perhaps I should extend tc-dmsetup to handle the normal case too. Patches welcome, of course.

As for accessing TC-encrypted ext2/3 partitions from Windows, I have no idea. On my computer I have avoided doing that because I didn&#039;t want to ask myself that question. In theory it should work a bit like this: TC handles the decryption stuff and designates a drive letter to use and for accessing the filesystem the ext2 driver automatically kicks in. One thing that may or may not help is trying a different ext2 driver, e.g. Ext2fsd.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary, or, John,</p>
<p>first off, you do know that the name you filled in there is a bit confusing, right? ;)</p>
<p>Anyway. tc-dmsetup currently doesn&#8217;t support &#8220;normal&#8221; TC partitions. I wrote it when TC for Linux did not support mounting Windows encrypted system drives *at all*. Now that it does, perhaps I should extend tc-dmsetup to handle the normal case too. Patches welcome, of course.</p>
<p>As for accessing TC-encrypted ext2/3 partitions from Windows, I have no idea. On my computer I have avoided doing that because I didn&#8217;t want to ask myself that question. In theory it should work a bit like this: TC handles the decryption stuff and designates a drive letter to use and for accessing the filesystem the ext2 driver automatically kicks in. One thing that may or may not help is trying a different ext2 driver, e.g. Ext2fsd.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary vs John Jr</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary vs John Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m too on Gentoo, and after compiling and then installing the XTS kernel module (plus a reboot to use new kernel code) this works perfectly.  I&#039;m wondering if I can mount normal TC partitions this way instead of doing &quot;truecrypt /dev/xxx /mnt/test&quot;?

also, for a related problem - when I boot into my windows side, how do I r/rw my TC partition linux formatted in ext2fs?  I used ext2ifs before but now that the partition is encrypted and in ext3, neither truecrypt(windows) nor ext2ifs can deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m too on Gentoo, and after compiling and then installing the XTS kernel module (plus a reboot to use new kernel code) this works perfectly.  I&#8217;m wondering if I can mount normal TC partitions this way instead of doing &#8220;truecrypt /dev/xxx /mnt/test&#8221;?</p>
<p>also, for a related problem &#8211; when I boot into my windows side, how do I r/rw my TC partition linux formatted in ext2fs?  I used ext2ifs before but now that the partition is encrypted and in ext3, neither truecrypt(windows) nor ext2ifs can deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. C. Denton</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-1930</link>
		<dc:creator>J. C. Denton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-1930</guid>
		<description>Ok, my problem is fixed, and has been for some time. I am really sorry, for not reporting back, but I totally forgot about the question I posted here. Thanks a lot for your mail Jan, but since it is not my regular e-mail I only found it now and was reminded of this. 

Here is the solution, it was very simple: My kernel was simply lacking XTS crypto support, even though the error message given by dmsetup did not give any indication of that at all. You might wanna mention that in the program requirements, though. My current kernel (2.6.25) still has XTS marked as Experimental, but my previous one (.23) didn&#039;t have it at all. So, I guess I am not the only one out there that need to do a kernel update for that. For completeness sake, my system has both the regular loopback device as well as the device mapper crypto target (not the crypto-loop device) coded into the kernel and this works just fine with multiple encrypted volumes. Adding an abitrary number in form of encrypted USB disks seems to work, too. So, I guess there is no limitation.

Once again I wanna thank Jan for this wonderful tool. I have it running on two computers now, without any problems, and I still keep using it in spite of the new TrueCrypt version claiming to offer the same functionality. I just like the slickness with which it perfectly integrates into my automount scripts. Contrary to this, I HAVE to use the official TC for my non-System windows drives and the way it messes up my mtab with those weird fuse mounts is just bad and not pretty at all.

Finally, Jan&#039;s program came in very handy when I was struggling to understand the TC Volume Specification, in order to make a low-level backup of all my MBRs, partition tables and crypto headers. Btw, I recommend doing that to everyone, in DMCrypt+Luks the single availability of the header is the single point of failure and TC only has the backup burned to the Rescue CD (apparently, there is no backup volume header on the driver for system encrypted drives).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, my problem is fixed, and has been for some time. I am really sorry, for not reporting back, but I totally forgot about the question I posted here. Thanks a lot for your mail Jan, but since it is not my regular e-mail I only found it now and was reminded of this. </p>
<p>Here is the solution, it was very simple: My kernel was simply lacking XTS crypto support, even though the error message given by dmsetup did not give any indication of that at all. You might wanna mention that in the program requirements, though. My current kernel (2.6.25) still has XTS marked as Experimental, but my previous one (.23) didn&#8217;t have it at all. So, I guess I am not the only one out there that need to do a kernel update for that. For completeness sake, my system has both the regular loopback device as well as the device mapper crypto target (not the crypto-loop device) coded into the kernel and this works just fine with multiple encrypted volumes. Adding an abitrary number in form of encrypted <acronym title="Universal Serial Bus">USB</acronym> disks seems to work, too. So, I guess there is no limitation.</p>
<p>Once again I wanna thank Jan for this wonderful tool. I have it running on two computers now, without any problems, and I still keep using it in spite of the new TrueCrypt version claiming to offer the same functionality. I just like the slickness with which it perfectly integrates into my automount scripts. Contrary to this, I HAVE to use the official TC for my non-System windows drives and the way it messes up my mtab with those weird fuse mounts is just bad and not pretty at all.</p>
<p>Finally, Jan&#8217;s program came in very handy when I was struggling to understand the TC Volume Specification, in order to make a low-level backup of all my MBRs, partition tables and crypto headers. Btw, I recommend doing that to everyone, in DMCrypt+Luks the single availability of the header is the single point of failure and TC only has the backup burned to the Rescue <acronym title="Compact Disc">CD</acronym> (apparently, there is no backup volume header on the driver for system encrypted drives).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links Tagged With "truecrypt" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-1848</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "truecrypt" - JabberTags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>[...] public links &gt;&gt; truecrypt   How to use TrueCrypt-encrypted Windows system drives on Linux Saved by jannideath on Wed 05-11-2008   Useful Software - Truecrypt Saved by omifan92 on Sun [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; truecrypt   How to use TrueCrypt-encrypted Windows system drives on Linux Saved by jannideath on Wed 05-11-2008   Useful Software &#8211; Truecrypt Saved by omifan92 on Sun [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>For reference, here&#039;s a rough summary of the reply I sent to J.C.&#039;s comment: 1) check the syslog (including dmesg logfile) for relevant information. 2) I vaguely recall that at some point, the loop driver was unable to support multiple loop devices unless compiled as a module.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For reference, here&#8217;s a rough summary of the reply I sent to J.C.&#8217;s comment: 1) check the syslog (including dmesg logfile) for relevant information. 2) I vaguely recall that at some point, the loop driver was unable to support multiple loop devices unless compiled as a module.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. C. Denton</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>J. C. Denton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for the program Jan. Unfortunately, it doesn&#039;t work for me (on a Gentoo Linux system already using DM-Crypt + Luks for Linux system encryption). I actually think your program is fine only when the output is piped to dmsetup that one fails and replies that the device or resource is busy. Can&#039;t figure out what it is, any ideas ? The system layout is Windows system encryption on hda1 (not the entire hard drive, only on that one), plus 2 more partitions encrypted using DM-Crypt + Luks. Maybe it interferes somehow ? Or I got the parameters wrong, why do I have to give the partition and on top of it the disk device ? Can&#039;t that be deduced ? Or is it because your program needs something from the MBR which might be somewhere else ? Thanks a lot. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for the program Jan. Unfortunately, it doesn&#8217;t work for me (on a Gentoo Linux system already using DM-Crypt + Luks for Linux system encryption). I actually think your program is fine only when the output is piped to dmsetup that one fails and replies that the device or resource is busy. Can&#8217;t figure out what it is, any ideas ? The system layout is Windows system encryption on hda1 (not the entire hard drive, only on that one), plus 2 more partitions encrypted using DM-Crypt + Luks. Maybe it interferes somehow ? Or I got the parameters wrong, why do I have to give the partition and on top of it the disk device ? Can&#8217;t that be deduced ? Or is it because your program needs something from the MBR which might be somewhere else ? Thanks a lot. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan-Krueger.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using TrueCrypt(R)&#8217;s encrypted system partitions from Linux, now with less bugs</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/development/truecrypt-system-drive-on-linux/comment-page-1#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan-Krueger.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using TrueCrypt(R)&#8217;s encrypted system partitions from Linux, now with less bugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=37#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>[...] Creative Engineering       &#171; How to use TrueCrypt®-encrypted Windows system drives on Linux [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Creative Engineering       &laquo; How to use TrueCrypt®-encrypted Windows system drives on Linux [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
