<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relatively absolute philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jan-krueger.net/ke/relatively-absolute-philosophy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jan-krueger.net/ke/relatively-absolute-philosophy</link>
	<description>Jan Krüger&#039;s blog thingy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/ke/relatively-absolute-philosophy/comment-page-1#comment-6352</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=150#comment-6352</guid>
		<description>you rejected them because everything is relative!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you rejected them because everything is relative!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deetak</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/ke/relatively-absolute-philosophy/comment-page-1#comment-5692</link>
		<dc:creator>deetak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=150#comment-5692</guid>
		<description>I see what you mean. I haven&#039;t really looked into it except running into it as an alternative to the traditional physicalist/dualist problem. Might be useful in expanding what we consider consciousness would cover (as *everything* would have it in some sense) or investigating &#039;degrees of consciousness&#039; - I can&#039;t imagine yet how we would get to that knowledge though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you mean. I haven&#8217;t really looked into it except running into it as an alternative to the traditional physicalist/dualist problem. Might be useful in expanding what we consider consciousness would cover (as *everything* would have it in some sense) or investigating &#8216;degrees of consciousness&#8217; &#8211; I can&#8217;t imagine yet how we would get to that knowledge though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/ke/relatively-absolute-philosophy/comment-page-1#comment-5686</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=150#comment-5686</guid>
		<description>I did some extensive research (on a non-scientific level, tee hee) about various philosophical and spiritual positions, and that also briefly covered panpsychism. It&#039;s something I&#039;m agnostic towards: I consider it to be possibly true but I don&#039;t particularly care whether it is... it doesn&#039;t seem to me as if, if anyone showed panpsychism to be &quot;correct&quot;, I could draw any new and helpful conclusions from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some extensive research (on a non-scientific level, tee hee) about various philosophical and spiritual positions, and that also briefly covered panpsychism. It&#8217;s something I&#8217;m agnostic towards: I consider it to be possibly true but I don&#8217;t particularly care whether it is&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t seem to me as if, if anyone showed panpsychism to be &#8220;correct&#8221;, I could draw any new and helpful conclusions from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deetak</title>
		<link>http://jan-krueger.net/ke/relatively-absolute-philosophy/comment-page-1#comment-5678</link>
		<dc:creator>deetak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 06:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jan-krueger.net/?p=150#comment-5678</guid>
		<description>I also agree with your positions on these various &#039;isms&#039;. The ones I moved out of most recently are scientism and reductionism. Your post &quot;A scientific defense of pseudoscience&quot; is also very clear.

Just wondering, have you ever looked into panpsychism? A good explanation I found on ( http://www.panpsychism.net/html/what_is_it.html  rest of the article is kind of disorganized though):

&quot;Christian de Quincey said &quot;If both mind and matter are real, and are not separate substances, and neither can emerge or evolve from the other, then both matter and mind have always existed together, are coextensive, co-eternal and in some way, co-creative. Panpsychism, variously called panexperientalism or radical materialism, proposes that matter (or physical energy) itself is intrinsically sentient or experiental, all the way down.&quot; (When de Quincey says, &quot;all the way down,&quot; he means from the entire universe down through the sub atomic particles or waves.)&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree with your positions on these various &#8216;isms&#8217;. The ones I moved out of most recently are scientism and reductionism. Your post &#8220;A scientific defense of pseudoscience&#8221; is also very clear.</p>
<p>Just wondering, have you ever looked into panpsychism? A good explanation I found on ( <a href="http://www.panpsychism.net/html/what_is_it.html">http://www.panpsychism.net/html/what_is_it.html</a>  rest of the article is kind of disorganized though):</p>
<p>&#8220;Christian de Quincey said &#8220;If both mind and matter are real, and are not separate substances, and neither can emerge or evolve from the other, then both matter and mind have always existed together, are coextensive, co-eternal and in some way, co-creative. Panpsychism, variously called panexperientalism or radical materialism, proposes that matter (or physical energy) itself is intrinsically sentient or experiental, all the way down.&#8221; (When de Quincey says, &#8220;all the way down,&#8221; he means from the entire universe down through the sub atomic particles or waves.)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
